<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAPITALISM: A Love Story &#8211; Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolshite.net/review/2009/11/23/capitalism-love-story-movie-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolshite.net/review/2009/11/23/capitalism-love-story-movie-review/</link>
	<description>Praise, Flaming and Indifference about the films and other stuff we visually ingest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Moyle</title>
		<link>http://www.coolshite.net/review/2009/11/23/capitalism-love-story-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-15392</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Moyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolshite.net/?p=7172#comment-15392</guid>
		<description>I think Michael needs a new filmic term named after him. His work in some respects isn&#039;t a Doco, more a &quot;Mooreamentary&quot;. While I personally enjoy his work as my views tend to be more inline with him than not he is no better in some respects to Today Tonight and other gutter press, but instead of picking on the little guys and their oponents, he is willing to go for the biggest fish in the sea. I can respect a man with the balls to do that.  
 
I watched Moore, &quot;mike and me&quot; doco when I was a kid and must admit that the man has improved no end in presenting something that keeps your attention. Now if he would just present a more 2 sided argument so people who are sitting on the sidelines can say &quot;I understand and I think Moore is correct&quot; I feel he would do better overall. As far as I can tell his docos get view by people who already have a similar opinion and want something to reinforce their ideals. Where as I think Moore would prefer people which are sideliners or don&#039;t have an opinion to come to his cause by watching the doco. Not that I am saying they don&#039;t, but he has such a rep now that I bet that the ticket taking are fairly low in the states of USA that really need to see his message. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Michael needs a new filmic term named after him. His work in some respects isn&#039;t a Doco, more a &quot;Mooreamentary&quot;. While I personally enjoy his work as my views tend to be more inline with him than not he is no better in some respects to Today Tonight and other gutter press, but instead of picking on the little guys and their oponents, he is willing to go for the biggest fish in the sea. I can respect a man with the balls to do that.  </p>
<p>I watched Moore, &quot;mike and me&quot; doco when I was a kid and must admit that the man has improved no end in presenting something that keeps your attention. Now if he would just present a more 2 sided argument so people who are sitting on the sidelines can say &quot;I understand and I think Moore is correct&quot; I feel he would do better overall. As far as I can tell his docos get view by people who already have a similar opinion and want something to reinforce their ideals. Where as I think Moore would prefer people which are sideliners or don&#039;t have an opinion to come to his cause by watching the doco. Not that I am saying they don&#039;t, but he has such a rep now that I bet that the ticket taking are fairly low in the states of USA that really need to see his message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
